TNQDE: Not a Wart

Do you ever get startled by a word that you know perfectly well? So many words I know either primarily from having heard them or from having read them and when they show up in the less-familiar form, I get a bit discombobulated. Discombobulated, for example, is something you just don’t see in print. Similarly, as I realized while I was doing some editing this morning, you never see…


Right? I mean, geeks who are a bit goofy with a slight penchant for rpgs use this often enough, but unless you’re reading Piers Anthony or Robert Asprin, when are you going to see it in print? Not that often, that’s when.

The first question John asked is if the word has any relation to “wart.” No, no it doesn’t. Both come from Middle English, but a wart is just a wearte. A “thwart,” however, is also “athwart.” (Are you laughing yet? Because I am just cracking myself up over here.) But seriously, “athwart” is the archaic adjective/preposition form of “thwart,” probably taking its form in comparison with the more common word that means more or less the same thing, i.e., “across.”

“Thwart” actually goes back to Middle English thwert, meaning “across,” which in turn goes back to the Old Norse thvert, which is a specific form of the word thverr, which means, wait for it…”transverse.” And there you have it: our word which is modernly used most to describe the actions of a nemesis or a nautical seat comes from a concept that can basically be boiled down to getting in the way.


One thought on “TNQDE: Not a Wart

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.